I've been challenged to a duel!

Go down



I've been challenged to a duel!

Not a physical duel, but an intellectual duel! Why? Well... because fuck me, that's why!

This little exchange happened over the WikiLeaks scandal, and my pussy-out, cowardly, weak-ass, bullshit, twisting, dishonest remarks on the subject. I daresay I'm glad the challenger avoided personal attacks and stuck to the matter at hand!

Anyways, for those of you in need of an escape from studying, or who are majoring in Trollology (the study of Trolls), here's a good case study. The thread starter is who challenges me to a duel (on his own forum) and I'm the first to reply in the thread, called CC for short.


And please, forgive me for posting on a Guns n Roses forum, but old habits die hard.


Posts : 1024
Join date : 2009-07-31
Age : 27
Location : Your mother's a whore

View user profile

Back to top Go down

- Similar topics
Share this post on: diggdeliciousredditstumbleuponslashdotyahoogooglelive

I've been challenged to a duel! :: Comments


Post on Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:38 pm by strangerthanfiction

Anyone who can't spell "British" properly deserves to be punched. My god that guy sounded like a pompous idiot.

Back to top Go down


Post on Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:42 pm by J-Mads

He's actually English

Back to top Go down


Post on Mon Dec 06, 2010 6:49 pm by strangerthanfiction


Back to top Go down

Post on Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:09 pm by dohnage18

He didn't read your stuff. He read one of the things he posted and thought you wrote it. The part about you being honest.

I love how people say things on the internet like, "dud, if you and i had a real debate, i'd kick youre ass." Laugh. Out. Loud.

I love idjits on the internet. Nice job. You kicked his ass.

Back to top Go down


Post on Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:15 am by AgentW

you dirty communist china.

couldn't head over to the actual duel thread.

the cluster bomb part, they're only illegal if you agree to such a thing. Which the US has not. It's probably part of the Geneva Accords, which we use as guidelines, but not as actual laws of war.

that section about the decapitation, I went to the link, which is an unknown source, with no citation of the actual document, meaning it means beans atm. the chopper attack, while highly regretable, doesn't show people on a killing rampage (much) but they called in the targets and recieved permission to engage, and if I recall, the reporters did have armed escorts (so not saying its good and permissible, but shit happens, war is hell, welcome to skynet). I see nothing about teh US and Sri Lanka.

and what is this "liberation" spiel? kinda convoluted and lacking in sense, but he likes what he thinks is what I can tell from him.

and what about the other woman that accuses assange? he just mentions one of them. and about the red alert, http://www.interpol.int/Public/Wanted/Default.asp, he has no idea what he's talking about with it being the INTERPOL IS THE UN AND NWO TO GET WIKILEAKS deal.

I may have put a bunch down, of which none of it may matter anyways, but if you wanted any ammo or anything, it's there.

I'd say you're holding quite well, as he's starting to repeat himself.

tl:dr no summary here, read it ya lazy bastards.

Back to top Go down


Post on Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:33 pm by strangerthanfiction

nice tl;dr disclaimer

COMPLETELY UNRELATED: I am listening to Interpol as I read this and then you cited Interpol like the UN organisation and I was like FUCK YEAHHHHHHH WHAT NOW BITCHES.
The end.

Back to top Go down

Post  by Sponsored content

Back to top Go down

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum