2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.

View previous topic View next topic Go down

2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.

Post by The Prez on Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:28 pm

Through his closure of the Congressional forum and attempt to ban civil procedure in the United States. Any people who swore loyalty to Lucas F. Epp are supporting unconstitutional actions and are therefore failing to serve the Constitution. In this case the ruling in Hanna v. Clifton, et al. stands that these officials can be removed from office and possibly prevented from holding office ever again under the context of failing to serve.
avatar
The Prez

Posts : 1818
Join date : 2009-06-17
Age : 26
Location : Pewaukee, Wisconsin or Champaign, Illinois

View user profile http://www.youtube.com/user/DamnCrappyProduction

Back to top Go down

Re: 2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.

Post by AgentW on Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:11 am

Utahraptor sez-
utahraptor wrote:


just so you know.
avatar
AgentW

Posts : 917
Join date : 2009-05-26
Location : Mandalore

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.

Post by J-Mads on Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:32 am

After careful consideration and a consultation with various religious leaders, I have come thusly to this conclusion. Alleged child molester Lucas F. Epp clearly violated the Constitution as Acting President, and while such matters are supposed to be handled by the Senate, alleged business major Lucas F. Epp used illegal force to neglect their legal, and complete process of impeachment and conviction.

Alleged 9/11 co-conspirator Lucas F. Epp violated the Constitution, and continues to do so, metaphorically raping the rule of law and plunging this once mighty nation into an abyss of retardation and sterility. We are now little more than Shakers, and much less than Quakers.

The precedent set forth by Hanna v. Clifton is constitutionally applied here, so that alleged Maple Leafs fan Lucas F. Epp must be removed from whatever office he currently holds, legitimate or otherwise. However, I find no constitutional basis for the permanent removal, so long as he is not convicted of a felony and imprisoned. The Supreme Court is not here to incarcerate individuals, even child molesting, 9/11 planning, business major Maple Leafs fans. If the people freely elect him in a fair and legal campaign, he may hold office, unless a decision in criminal court prevents this.

I cannot convict any of his followers, because of the aforementioned retarded nature of the post-alleged-polygamist-Lucas-F.-Epp political world. It is not their fault that they are retarded, and while cases against individuals would be heard in a criminal court, this Court will not remove them from whatever offices they may hold at present.

Lastly, in a rare “double whammy decision”, The Court finds polygamy to be constitutional.

_________________
avatar
J-Mads

Posts : 1024
Join date : 2009-07-31
Age : 26
Location : Your mother's a whore

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.

Post by AgentW on Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:41 am

well the mormon's will finally relax
avatar
AgentW

Posts : 917
Join date : 2009-05-26
Location : Mandalore

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.

Post by McSnuggles on Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:05 pm

Jesus you've learned way too much about trolling Casey...

_________________
Master of Epic Lulz
Founder of the For The Lulz Party
For The Lulz Warrant List
avatar
McSnuggles
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1076
Join date : 2009-05-25
Location : Here

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: 2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum